[Archive]

Posted By: hankron

For the record, the significant issue with AAA is not that they sell pictures cut out of books (though many do not like the destruction of the books), but that these cutouts are not described authentically (authenticity necessitates sincerity). In other words, through weasel words and omission of essential details, the seller tries to make them appear like something more. If AAA were to describe clearly and succinctly in their auctions "This was a picture I just cut out of a Reach guide I bought on eBay", there would no be an issue of authenticity or deception.

It is legitimate to say that collectors are arbitrary and fickle (because it's true). AAA may justify that a Bazooka or Post card is a cut out, the same as a newspaper clipping. It is true that they are all cutouts. However, the seller always has the responsibility to accurately describe what is being sold. Arbitrary or not, the buyers have the right not to be deceived about what they are about to bid on. 'Bidder's resonable expectations' is not a phrase to be tossed aside by the seller trying to make money.

While what James is offering is not a premium (possibly a supplement, but that’s an issue for another thread), he does specifically say that it was cut from a publication.