View Single Post
  #29  
Old 07-11-2015, 01:33 PM
PowderedH2O PowderedH2O is offline
Sam Lemoine
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Greensboro/High Point, NC
Posts: 532
Default

To me it was design, photography, and backs. I can't go with player inclusion, otherwise sets like the 1955 Topps set would be hammered because of all the stars missing. I actually don't hate the 1968's. If I compared them to some of the sets of the 80's, I'd take the 68's in a heartbeat. But, compared to the cards from 63-67 and the 60's, it was a no brainer for me.
__________________
Actively bouncing aimlessly from set to set trying to accomplish something, but getting nowhere
Reply With Quote