View Single Post
  #81  
Old 06-28-2018, 10:09 AM
rdixon1208's Avatar
rdixon1208 rdixon1208 is offline
R Dixon
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sterlingfox View Post
So what you're saying is that Joe, or whoever the original buyer of the card is who offered more to maxcollector69, did nothing wrong? You even said yourself that's something you wouldn't do! Are you flipping serious!?!?

And Joe being the only other known owner of the card is plenty enough evidence to suspect him of being the buyer.

Where's the proof that Joe took the card in on trade? That's right. There's none!
This is where I think you're wrong. I understanding you suspecting him of being the buyer, but you're actually accusing him of it and demanding that he provide proof when you don't actually have any hard data to support your claim. That card could have changed hands multiple times between maxcollector69 and the guy who has it for sale now.

Robert Dixon
__________________
R Dixon
Reply With Quote