View Single Post
  #43  
Old 06-15-2016, 08:57 AM
drmondobueno's Avatar
drmondobueno drmondobueno is offline
Keith
ke.ith tem.ple
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Eastern sierras, Calif
Posts: 888
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rats60 View Post
Not true. There is a large percentage of great pitchers who were worse in the postseason. You can't just assume that Johnson would have excelled on the big stage. Matty, we know did with a .97 era and 4 shutouts in 11 games.

As far as who people at the time would have picked. The closest we have is the first hall of fame vote. Matty recieved more votes than Wajo. I believe that the reason was Matty's postseason performance.
Greg Maddox is another post season example of underperformer.

As for HOF votes, maybe playing in New York nuanced the vote?
__________________
T206 154/518 second time around
R312 49/50
1962 Topps 598/598 super set 694/697
...whatever I want

Last edited by drmondobueno; 06-15-2016 at 09:00 AM.
Reply With Quote