Quote:
Originally Posted by Maddog
Steve,
. With PSA or JSA you have no idea who is looking at something. Have the specific individual who is authenticating the item sign the cert and have a means of holding that person responsible. is their "opinion" is false.
Is this too much to ask?
|
Once again the subject of accountability for JSA and PSA enters the conversation. PSA , even with the BIG 3 there in name only ,and JSA will never have accountability as one of their characteristics/qualities as long as the collectors and dealers and AHs allow them to continue with business as usual . It would take a massive revolt of their services by the collectors and dealers and AHs to even have them consider accountability as to who and how many people looked at the item to render an opinion , why it was accepted as good or not accepted as good, and what methods were used to determine such opinion and issue a true LOA with those people's names and qualifications and a detailed description of their opinions on the LOA.
As long as the collectors and dealers and AHs follow PSA and JSA like lemmings over a cliff this accountability will never occur because it is not in PSA'S or JSA's interest to be accountable unlike Jim Stinson and Richard Simon who I consider accountable for all their opinion both positve and negative concerning autheticity of their items.