Quote:
Originally Posted by thecatspajamas
You can click on the green arrow to the right of the link in the google search to view the original cached version of the page, fwiw. If they changed the lot description though, there had to have been a reason for doing so, which could also include a request by the consignor. In circumstances like these, it's best to communicate with the AH directly to find out what is going on before blowing it up with public speculation.
http://www.hugginsandscott.com/cgi-b...pl/contact.htm |
Thanks for the green arrow tip, that shows the original title and description, though it does not include the original photo that was there.
I will contact the AH, but they open themselves up to public speculation when they show these things as work in progress. This is actually what my distaste is about. I do not know the reason for taking the photo and description of Rusie down, but through the auction house's own actions we can see that they are withholding something about the item as they originally presented it.
We were discussing a Mantle ball in a thread about Heritage, with conjecture about whether the ball had or had not been pre-certed by a TPA yet. The auction house came on here and expalined the situation. Do you think that was inappropriate action by the OP?
http://net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=171942