Thread: check later
View Single Post
  #14  
Old 09-28-2016, 11:09 AM
Beastmode Beastmode is offline
J@ohn B.ar#ne.s
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by botn View Post
Yup. In June they were all out in force--defending the market and/or completely in denial. There were some fabulous explanations they gave for why the market spiked--new money, aggressive advertising campaign by PSA, prices had been low for the previous 8 years...this was touted as a game changing time. LOL. Now silence by those same people and some of them are even posting regularly. The best part was when the market started to turn and these same guys defended the dip--too close to the National or the card in question was a weak example.

Several of the PSA 8 Rose rookies sold for $16K in June. This card was selling for $3-4K last year. You can assume that most of these were not paid for. If anyone is using those sales as data, then you shouldn't be in charge of your money.

The PSA 9 Rose rookie sales curve is....well...it isn't even a curve. $29K in June, $150K in July, $82K in August, $131K late August. Likely many non-paying winners for this card also.
Reply With Quote