Quote:
Originally Posted by jchcollins
Binders went out for me as a kid. Just too much stuff that is not necessarily part of a set or tightly grouped collection, and for whatever reason as an adult collector - I like stacks and piles and flipping and random organization; playing with my cards - better than I do the tight order of a binder.
My slabs are all in one box for slabs. My cards in One Touches or other mags are all in another box. My cards still only in toploaders or card savers are in a 3rd and 4th box. Even my 1971 Topps complete set, yes all 752 of them - are in two boxes full of toploaders. The expense might not make sense, (the weight of the boxes sure doesn’t) but I simply didn’t want them in a binder. It’s fair to say that I have an extreme dislike of binders these days.
I know, I know - they never really did anything to me…
|
Man, the highlighted portion of your post really hits home.
A while back, I decided to start getting more organized by putting all of the tons of random cards I have
(in myriad boxes) in order by year, to make life a bit 'easier.'
Ha!!! Biggest mistake evah, I tell you!!!!! Who the heck wants to flip through stacks of cards that are unnecessarily arranged in chronological order?????
Those are the makings of a lunatic!!!! 
To paraphrase good old
Patrick (wonder if his friends just called him Pat?) Henry,
"Give me randomness or give me death!!!"