Quote:
Originally Posted by freakhappy
You should be taking a shot at the seller. For one thing, PSA has already deemed them reprints...so why didn't he list them as reprints in his listings? He simply says that they are questionable authenticity, ...
|
Because PSA actually evaluated them as '? AUTHCTY' which I'm reading as meaning 'questionable authenticity'.
PSA is at fault. The bidders are idiots. The seller found the loophole (poor PSA label, idiot bidders) and is making out like a bandit...but is not an actual bandit.
Frank - thanks for posting. This is my entertainment for the evening.