What I posted is true Richard.
I was emailed by a Net54 autograph expert. One who no longer posts, but is quite well-known--and well-respected--among the cognoscenti. He believes the autograph is genuine.
But...
My post was made tongue-in-cheek. Because citing un-named sources to promote your argument is total bullshit. And you have a long history of doing just that.
I have no doubt what you said is true. But if you can't use the name, then don't post. Doing otherwise just makes you sound ridiculous.
And desperate.
Last edited by David Atkatz; 11-16-2017 at 09:29 AM.
|