[Archive]

Posted By: Rhys

Sounds to me like the kind of thing where the losses should be split between both parties. Happened to me once with another longtime forum member over a 1926 Spalding Champions Card worth $75. I had a receipt to show it was mailed, but no tracking number and we both agreed that it was just one of those things and I refunded him $37.50 and everyone was happy. We just sort of had an understanding that if the card ever did show up anywhere that the situation would be immediately rectified 100% rather than 50%.

Does not sound like either party should bear the entire loss when it involves two people doing honest business with a third party interferance.

Just my opinion.

Rhys