View Single Post
  #14  
Old 01-22-2018, 09:20 PM
whiteymet whiteymet is offline
Fr3d mcKi3
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: whiteymet
Posts: 2,001
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sflayank View Post
why is it that psa research has absolutely no knowledge whatsoever
they look things up and still have no knowledge
im going to vent on just a few issues over the years
and no matter what the issue they never give the public an explanation
for example i argue for 63 peel offs blank back and instructions
they refused for 10 years then suddenly ok we'll grade em
and yet they put in the registry a mantle who am i scratched off and listed it as the uncoated variety...took me forever to prove to them card doesnt exist
and finally they removed
1952-55 red man...2 reverses...both listed in bible refuse to acknowledge
1954 journal american 2 obverses also described in bible refuse to acknowledge
1964 meadowgold blue and green...actually told me to hard to tell the difference REally? but they can tell the difference between a 9 and a 10 from 2017?
and now the punchouts 1967...10 years of fighting to list the different lineups...finally they do...now years later they remove them with the explanation theyll no longer grade WTF
PSA customer service ..non existant....if you need an expert in your postwar research dept Im available....I can work from home
sflayank@aol.com
Larry:

Add the two different 1955 Exhibit Postcard backs to your list. One with a plain line down the middle on the reverse one with the words A MUTOSCOPE CARD.

This info is listed in the Standard Catalog, but PSA will not mark the flip or list both variations for Registry sets for some reason!!

SGC did list their first one for me noting it is a Mutoscope back.

Fred
Reply With Quote