Thread: Continuing the HOF debates -- Who Should NOT be in and why
View Single Post
  #9  
Old 05-04-2002, 05:47 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Continuing the HOF debates -- Who Should NOT be in and why
Posted By: jay behrens

then by your litmus test, Puckett is in. When I was dealing in the 80s I can't think of anyone that said said "Damn, got another Puckett". Part of the reason he got into the Hall is because of his national appeal, not just local.

Jay

Reply With Quote