Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth
The book is still very much out on Harper, but given the undeniable potential, teams are going to take risks.
|
I would understand taking a risk due to the potential upside as he enters his peak years. But it seems to me a shorter deal for high annual average salary would be more fitting and safe for the team involved. Reportedly turning down a 10-year $300 million offer from Nats implies he was searching for even MORE than that which is just ludicrous in my view. Gigantic money should be rewarded based on proven performance, not on potential, IMO.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk