Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy
None of the above. IMO, to qualify as a "ROOKIE card," the card should be produced either the year of or after a player's ROOKIE year.
If a player doesn't have a card that that fits that criteria, then he doesn't have a rookie card. He could have a first Topps card, first Bowman card, etc, but should not have what is considered to be a rookie card.
|
Something like a 1964 Pete Rose?
I thought about including that scenerio, but I didn't think anyone would vote for it. Shows how wrong I am.