Quote:
Originally Posted by tschock
.... or.... that company sees a revenue stream by 'loose' authentication standards, and knowing the public (ie multiple individuals) interprets 'opinion' to be 'authentication', continues to provide that revenue stream. Or if you'd rather, one company's whole origination is based on a 'loose' authentication.
The point being.... that one is not more susceptible to corruption than the other.
|
Could not disagree more. It would take an entire company working together to perpetuate the fraud you're talking about vs one person. Also if a TPG did what you're saying they fall out of favor in the hobby and become obsolete, which we've all seen happen to a once prominent TPG who is no longer around and other TPG's no one puts stock in.