Adcock
Interesting point. His 52 was a high number card, presumably produced late in the 52 season since those cards hit the market in late summer and did not sell well at the time. The excess was supposedly destroyed after a period of storage ( legend says deep sixed), presumably after the decision was made to proceed with the 53 set. But if Adcock was not traded until after the season ended, not sure that helps explain anything.
Topps is famous for re using old photos in it's sets, but as you point out, using next year's photo would be novel.
Dave Hornish ?
|