Posted By:
Joe_G.Ah yes, glad to see a little OJ discussion. As usual Jay asked some great questions. To add to the list with a "Detroit bias" influence . . .
Why no Baldwin, Bennett, Getzien, & White for the initial 1887 '0' numbered cards? Baldwin lead the league in just about every pitching catagory the previous year, Bennett was considered by many to be the League's best catcher, Getzien was also coming off a solid year (30-11 W-L), and Deacon White was highly respected as a very accomplished player nearing the end of his career. Detroit was short changed several key players in '87. All other National League teams had better representation. I intend to figure out why in good time.
Best Regards,
Joe Gonsowski