I am not an expert; however, that item looks off to me. It seems a bit lopsided (supposedly from game use) without the wear one might expect to find on a 100+ year old baseball that was knocked around. In short, it doesn't look properly "worn" to me, considering other characteristics.
Just my uneducated opinion. I could be very wrong.
__________________
Eric Perry
Currently collecting:
T206 (132/524)
1956 Topps Baseball (189/342)
"You can observe a lot by just watching."
- Yogi Berra
Last edited by Eric72; 03-23-2014 at 05:50 PM.
Reason: Clarification
|