View Single Post
  #21  
Old 05-12-2009, 10:11 PM
MikeU MikeU is offline
member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 37
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JK View Post
My assumption, after reading the email, was that Kevin may not have provided an honest response when asked to review cards for certain collectors (which he states he has done hundreds of times). In other words, upon reviewing an altered card, he simply failed to disclose his opinion that the card was indeed altered - thereby insuring that the particular card took its place in the "targets" collection.

Of course, there are a lot of assumptions in there.
Why would Kevin do this to Jim Crandel?
Reply With Quote