[Archive]

Posted By: benge610

I do..

agree, Pete and point very well taken: the item in question is so "current" for provenance purposes as compared to vintage items discussed around these boards and found at auctions; authentication should have been a breeze by comparison.

I'm just so damn glad to be around the vintage talk again, that I posted expressing opinions about a position that I don't necessarily consider a strong one. It's just nice to bat the ball around a bit again!

Thanks for all of your comments, everyone.

Ben.