View Single Post
  #12  
Old 11-20-2018, 04:46 AM
kkkkandp's Avatar
kkkkandp kkkkandp is offline
{K.e.v.i.n_C.u.m.m.i.n.g.s}
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Closter, NJ
Posts: 1,100
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe_G. View Post
I love the humor in this thread but as someone who collects coupons I'll offer an alternate review.

This is the second, maybe third graded coupon I've seen, all Goodwin N173 coupons. Out of the hundreds of different early tobacco coupons, there are only a handful that would cover the grading fee, this being one of them. As of late these N173 coupons have fetched $50-$100 each, far more than they would garner a mere ten years ago. In most cases it would be a bad idea to grade coupons (from a value perspective).

If PSA and others wish to legitimately authenticate coupons they should try to become knowledgeable on them (not easy, very little available material). PSA has a couple mistakes on this rather popular and recognizable coupon . . . It was issued in 1889 (not 1887) and shouldn't reference N172. All Goodwin US tobacco packs in 1889 likely included this coupon or one very similar to it (3 different 1889 coupons). Some of these Goodwin cigarette packs didn't include N172s but instead N165 and others. A more accurate label would read . . .

1889 Goodwin Redemption Coupon - Type 2
Redemption for N173, A36, A37, A35, & A38


I list the albums in the order they are referenced on the coupon.
Joe, you are far too logical and precise to become a grader!
Reply With Quote