[Archive]

Posted By: identify7

Perhaps I am equally dense here, but I strive for better than mere equality in density. In any case, it seems to me that Mike Campbell has generated information which indicates with a 75-80% certainty that the Polar cards were made in the fifties, then never distributed. The opposing view (which is not in disagreement with the opinion Mike has obtained) states that the Polar cards were made more recently, perhaps using old materials, then never distributed.

Is the simple process of making a card - without ever distributing it, to anyone - sufficient to make it a collectible?

My vote is no.

I guess there must be something here which I have yet to grasp. Please clarify what I do not understand. Thank you.