[Archive]

Posted By: Jon Canfield

Not to go too much against the grain but I can remember past threads when we have complained that grading companies hammer otherwise beautiful cards with tons of eye appeal to a 1 or 2 simply because a spot of paperloss on the back.

Now, we see scans of two cards that have beautiful eye appeal and a spot of paperloss on the back and we complain because they are graded a 4 and not a 1 or 2.

So, in my opinion, we need to make up our collective minds . I personally do not see a problem with grading these cards a "4". Sure, I understand that we need some conistency in grades but maybe this is a step in the right direction. After all, change must start somewhere.