I hope for a hobby movement for a more realistic understanding of grading, so I actually see Joe's rewriting of it to be good. He states that grading is subjective and full of margins of error, and I hope for the hobby to view it as that. If you can often quote the President of CU himself as to the subjectivity, margin of error and errors, that would serve the purpose.
Last edited by drcy; 08-17-2019 at 02:27 PM.
|