View Single Post
  #4  
Old 07-22-2006, 03:08 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Recognizing Fake Goudeys

Posted By: fkw

The Dickey card is a tough one, especially since the photos are at an angle and slightly blurry.

There are many different types of R319 reprints, and some are easy to spot (black ink back, perforated edges, borders too wide, scuffed back, etc.), but some are better and tougher to spot in a picture or scan.

The places I look is the ends of the red strip on most but not every single authentic card will slightly extend into the border more than the background color just above it. Most reprint will have a perfectly straight color edge all the way around the borders, while the authentic R319 cards will have certain colors and the red strip not line up perfect at the border.

The bleed through you look for on the back is not a bleed through, it is a wet sheet transfer, where the sheets of the authentic cards were stacked and some of the front ink of the bottom sheet transferred to the back of the sheet above it. The red strip at bottom is the most noticed color transfer seen on the back (but not every authentic R319 has this).

Other things I look at are the edges of the photo being cropped and compare the distance from certain parts of the card to the border. On the Dickey it is tougher as the only things close to the border are the name "Bill Dickey" and the blue line across the top. On the reprint the blue line may be narrower (cropped photo), but its hard to tell from the pictures.

In person the reprints should have a smoother slightly glossy surface, and the card stock should be far thinner.

That card with that blurry picture will fool collectors. The back ink color looks good, and it is not one of the Renata Galasso reprint (scuffed between the "GUM CO." and "BOSTON"). Its one of the tougher reprints, most are easier, especially the Ruths.

Reply With Quote