Quote:
Originally Posted by scmavl
I'd say '50 Bowman. I just didn't like the smaller size as compared to '51 Bowman. But after getting a few in hand, and seeing all of the great rookie/early cards of historic players, I'm a fan. And I'd say '49 Bowman as well, but to a lesser degree.
 |
I would agree with the 1950's Bowman too. They were always too small. But I picked up a few and like the look.