View Single Post
  #48  
Old 09-01-2014, 10:05 AM
bosoxfan bosoxfan is offline
rich
member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: north jersey
Posts: 98
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drcy View Post
Dowd has said the evidence points to Rose betting against the Reds and he believes Rose bet against the Reds.

This "only bet for the Reds" story appears to nothing more than an urban myth concocted by pathological liar (Rose) and repeated by his followers. At this point, only the cognitively challenged take what Rose says as "the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth," especially when Dowd contradicts.
Having evidence pointing to Rose betting against the Reds is simply not true.

With the evidence they have on him, they matched his betting slips with the games he bet on the Reds and found no proof of him even overusing his best pitchers for those games. They certainly never found evidence of him betting against the Reds.

Ban him from baseball, coaching, managing, but put him on the HOF ballot. He'll probably never get voted in anyway
Reply With Quote