Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon
That was it....Thanks Andy. So, as I was saying  , without a differentiator such as this, it is impossible to tell. |
That was what I was looking for. Does anyone have any confirmed e90-1 blank backs using an an e90-1 exclusive identifier (other than the Krause I just picked up)? Then that added to the second question in my second post, if there aren't could it be possible that Krause was suppose to be in another set but wasn't included in the final printing with the backs. The other possibility I thought of was could it be that there was another uncataloged set that was intentionally left blank back for distribution that did include the Krause, thus needing its own identifying set designation?