Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerplyr80
I agree he obviously omitted reprint from the title and description intentionally to deceive people. Despite the other comment this seems quite malicious to me.
I'm always suspicious of nice looking raw cards online though and seeing as how this one looked like a 10 I might have done a little more digging before bidding personally. Too good to be true.
|
My most recent quest has been raw, high-grade Hall-of-Famers for the years 1957-1969.
I'm still sixty base cards away - almost all of the previous cards have come from very familiar sellers with whom I have never had issues.
I missed another, supposedly genuine, copy of this card earlier this week...looked almost as good for about forty dollars less.
Have to remember this lesson and be more patient.