Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon
I am still going with "no go" on this one. The back looks to have fake staining too. But maybe I am wrong, I have been before.
|
I just did a little digging and I'm flipping my vote. The W516-2-1 had deeper color and contrast. Also, the centering and near-perfect cut are a bit suspect. There are also a few examples of reprints floating around that look all too similar. So, Leon is probably right again.