View Single Post
  #7  
Old 09-29-2020, 04:45 AM
swarmee's Avatar
swarmee swarmee is offline
J0hn Raff3rty
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Niceville FL
Posts: 6,923
Default

PSA's normal policy in these cases is to award the higher grade with an OC qualifier if the centering would drop the grade by AT LEAST 2 grades. So the grader *at the time* would have given it a 6 or lower.
However, PSA is well-known to be inconsistent in this. It would be easy to determine the centering of this card top-to-bottom just by taking the measurements and dividing. Then you can compare against the PSA grading standards (which we know they don't really follow very well) to see what it SHOULD be given on a regrade.
However, PSA has supposedly tightened up their centering standards this year because of the ridicule they've been getting on message boards, IMO. Although I still believe they're eye-balling it rather than truly determining it.

OP card: Top 263 - 242 pixels = 21. Bottom 829-823 = 6 pixels. So slightly worse than 75/25.

russcpa's card: Top border: 290-269 pixels = 21 pixels. Bottom border: 877-870 pixels = 7 pixels. That's 75/25 centering by my count. According to the Grading Standards page, that is the dividing line between a 6 and a 7. So if you want to try for a PSA 7, you can. Might have had a better shot last year.
https://www.psacard.com/resources/gradingstandards
Quote:
NM 7: Centering must be approximately 70/30 to 75/25 or better on the front...
__________________
--
PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head
PSA: Regularly Get Cheated
BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern
SGC: Closed auto authentication business
JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC
Oh, what a difference a year makes.

Last edited by swarmee; 09-29-2020 at 04:56 AM.
Reply With Quote