Quote:
Originally Posted by clydepepper
While I am sure that the omission was due to the lack of perceived hobby-wide interest and importance, I am still disappointed that the one-of-one 1904 Allegheny cards were not mentioned.
The only cards rarer do not exist at all.
cm
|
Not sure if you were being sarcastic or not, but the author stated this at the beginning of the article:
"To make it clear, this list was not assembled with scarcity as the lone factor. Each card combines a level of scarcity with popularity, extreme importance and other factors. There are certainly extreme rarities in existence that are clearly harder to find than several of the entries on the list, but some of them are considered esoteric by hobby standards."
I like the Allegheny cards also, but I understand why they did not include them on the list.