Posted By:
JimBThe only thing for certain is that every published hobby checklist from 1930-2007 considers it a T206. I am not going to debate this again. For those interested they can search old threads. The debate is boring and tedious at this point. Nobody has conclusive evidence, but everybody seems to want to speak with definative and authoratative rhetoric. I was wondering when this thread was going to come this. Why don't we cut the rhetoric and when some actual evidence comes in that conclusively establishes what the card is, we can talk about it then. Until then, I will follow hobby dinausors like Jefferson Burdick (who defined what a T206 is) and Bill Heitman who wrote the book on them.
JimB
Edited spelling per Barry's correction. 