View Single Post
  #5  
Old 12-25-2018, 06:27 PM
Collect Equity's Avatar
Collect Equity Collect Equity is offline
J.
Jonathan Rys.kamp
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 129
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samosa4u View Post
A thousand dollars for a 62' Nannina Pele is quite a lot, in my opinion.
I totally agree that this is a lot of money for a Nannina. There are a lot of other good candidates of 1960s Pele cards I would have guessed to reach $1K before this one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by samosa4u View Post
. This card is not rare at all. Furthermore, I believe he has two cards from this set (one with a straight face and the other is of him smiling).
It does have two variations in the set. In some ways having two variations in the set could be an argument for bringing it down in price. But for me it's the opposite as variations increase a cards desirability because once I get one I need the other variation(s).

One interesting thing to note is the side facing (smiling) variation also sold in the same auction in a higher grade (PSA 4.5 v. PSA 4) for just shy of $800 (See LINK)

I haven't seen one or the other variation being more rare, so I am guessing it's just a matter of who is bidding. In comparing the two cards, the 3 highest bidders were: $1,031, $1,006, & $777 for the front facing PSA 4 and $796, $786, and $654 for the Side Facing (smiling) PSA 4.5 card. So they actually would have both ended in the same exact ballpark if the two $1K bids hadn't both been placed. I am guessing that the price discrepancy is just related to luck of who's bidding and there was also likely a $1K bid on the second Nannina as well but no one bumped it up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by samosa4u View Post
There are other Pele cards from the 60s that are a lot more difficult to find. One of my favorites is the 1962 E.D.I. Milano Calciocampioni Mondiali Del Cile:
This card also has two variations, one with and without writing. Do you know if these were released by the same manufacturer? Also, have you seen one as being more rare than the other?
Reply With Quote