[Archive]

Posted By: Tom Boblitt

and they were incredible cards. BUT.........cards with back stains as Greg said. Otherwise, they'd minimally been 7's, 8's, 9's. I'd agree that someone is going to attempt something on those backs to move them into much higher holders. Who knows......science is ever evolving..........couple of them were bought by people in the room.

The Harry Wright Kbats card was absolutely stunning card. Looked undergraded at a 4 but as we know SGC does tend to grade tightly. I thought could have been a 6 from a cursory glance but I didn't look at it really closely.