The Wallace no cap we know was an error that was corrected at some point in the run. It could very well be the case that Wallace was printed in lesser quantities. Your arguement that Wallace's pop numbers hold no water when you have Cobb at nearly 2X the amount of all the others. If you add the one line and two line together the numbers match. It's the same card just one was a corrected error.
Bresnahan to Wallace is all opinion!
__________________
Andrew
Member since 2009
Last edited by T205 GB; 08-22-2013 at 02:44 PM.
|