Quote:
Originally Posted by tedzan
Come on Pat, this is quite laughable: "getting baited in by your underhanded comments."
I have never, ever INITIATED negative comments against you. That's not my style. Yes, I may have responded with some remarks, and only because you have numerous times
on this forum called me a liar.
But, so did your two "buddies" Rivera and Cathey.
For years these two guys were very appreciative of my research into the T206 set. They would regularly pick my brain regarding T206's. Hey, I could bring up many Net54 posts
dating back to 2006 as evidence of this. And then, suddenly, in 2012 they turned on me.
I was especially disappointed in Jim Rivera. For many years I sold (or traded) him many, many rare back T206's at the Philly Show. When I got BROAD LEAF's, EPDG's, HINDU's,
LENOX, etc., I'd save them for him.
Jim thought he would give it a try being a dealer at the Philly Show, so I gladly allowed him to share my booth (circa 2009-2010). I would advertise "the Jim & Ted team" set-up
at Booth #408. We had fun "Talkin T206's" for hours at the Show. I met his family and he met my wife. I recall one time when a "walk-in" brought us a bunch of T206's. I started
sorting them out according to the Series they were in. One card in this lot was a PIEDMONT42 Wiltse (cap). I quickly recognized it as one of only 9 subjects known in the 460-only series....Jim was really impressed.
Oh well, Jim unfortunately showed me how "appreciative" he was ! !
So, that's the story Pat. I could tell you much more, but I don't think you want to hear it. Nor do the most of the members of this forum.
Good bye.
TED Z
T206 Reference
. |
Ted, I pointed out your initial negative comment. In post #68 you said I was
uninformed and misleading people. The uniformed and misleading information
you referred to was based on your opinion not a fact so your comments were
absolutely negative.
I have been posting on here for 8+ years and we have had many heated
arguments but I have
never called you a liar. And to be clear
I'm not calling you a liar now either I'm merely saying you're wrong.
I'm sure there are several people saying here we go again but I think I
have the right to defend myself when you say I called you a liar several
times when it never happened not once.
Now I ask you something you ask me all the time show me proof.
Show me where I made a negative comment towards you prior to post #68
and show me a post of mine where I called you a liar.
I expect silence when you can't come up with proof but I think owe you it
to me to respond when you accuse me of calling you a liar.