[Archive]

Posted By: PASJD

So why did he have any reason to check further when the bat got returned because the buyer was misinformed about ball markings? It still isn't adding up in my mind. Again, I am not saying I doubt Bushing because I haven't met him and can't assess his credibility first hand, but this explanation does not add up to me. Indeed, now that I think about it, he should have been able to tell the first time what time period the bat was from (based on the H and B records) and THAT ALONE should have prompted "further research" into whether it was a streak bat and thus possibly worth hundreds of thousands more, no? What am I missing here?