Quote:
Originally Posted by David Atkatz
It certainly does. The court found for the defendant, and against PSA.
|
Ah, I had to go back and I now see the link within the link that says as much.
Very glad to see that. The court should very well have found what they did. However, I do feel the need to point out that they did not find anything against PSA. The court merely and rightfully stated that PSA is rendering an opinion, nothing more or less, which is not enough to show that the defendant acted fraudulently.