Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric72
"Gone with the stain. Dick Towle"
Some jokes write themselves.
As some of you know, I personally think that soaking a card constitutes alteration. Yes, I understand that mine is a minority opinion, and don't wish to revisit my recent vodka fueled rant on the subject.
What I do wish is...to state here that someone using chemicals (other than the universal solvent) to remove stains from a card, if they go to sell it without disclosing the alteration, is just plain wrong. And, in my opinion, anyone who has someone else perform the alteration before selling the card without full disclosure is just as unethical.
Additionally, and here is the reason for me leaving this post, I place Mr. Towle in the same category as those who sell pack wrappers with the original pieces of gum or sell the original flips from cracked out graded cards.
Enabling fraud is just shy of actually committing it. Just my two cents...and I actually don't apologize if that statement offends anyone...especially Mr. Dick Towle.
Best regards, and happy to stand by my opinion by having my full name in this post.
|
Do you also believe it is wrong to have works of art cleaned and restored?
I'm not picking an arguement with you, as I agree that full disclosure must be practiced.