Quote:
Originally Posted by shelly
Wayne, agreed that they gave us the date of the ball to show that the ball is authentic. It does not make the autographs on the ball authentic. That is what I find hypocritical. They have never once said that there most respected people authenticated crap. Know because the ball is real we should think that the autographs have to be as well.  |
It does not make it authentic, but it shows that they have (finally) done their due diligence on this ball at least.
They are still coupling the dating of the ball WITH the TPA LOAs. THAT is their argument for authenticity, for whatever it is worth. And they need to recognize that we know the Gehrig sweet spot ball had those same TPA LOAs