NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

View Poll Results: Should there be user titles based on activity on the board?
yes 33 27.97%
no 85 72.03%
Voters: 118. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-01-2009, 01:18 PM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is offline
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,548
Default User Titles- yes or no?

So here is the question. Should we have user titles that are based on your # of posts on the board, which would change as you post more?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-01-2009, 01:29 PM
batsballsbases's Avatar
batsballsbases batsballsbases is offline
Al
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: From Ct+ NY now retired in North Carolina
Posts: 2,184
Default yes no

Leon,
I say no. Junior memember,senior member,dead memember,foolish member.
To me its just another way to start a new problem. Its fine the way it is. Dont you just love these things!!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-01-2009, 01:37 PM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is offline
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,548
Default

and you get your vote!!! I love doing polls...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-01-2009, 02:40 PM
Ladder7's Avatar
Ladder7 Ladder7 is offline
Steve F
St.eve F@llet.ti
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 2,030
Default

Nah, meaningless feature.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-01-2009, 02:46 PM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is offline
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,548
Default no worries

We will let the poll go a few days. As I said before if there was a large percentage that didn't want to do it then we won't. It wasn't even going to have to be 50% in order to not do it.....SO it looks like the board is speaking.....I thought it would be fun but I have been wrong before....No big deal....after the poll I will go look at the options and, if it continues the way it is, will just do away with that feature. I am sure the other moderators (and I) will still have a title because we need one but that's about it..Thanks to all who have voted so far.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-01-2009, 02:47 PM
barrysloate barrysloate is offline
Barry Sloate
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 8,293
Default

I voted "no" because when you think about it, what difference does it make how often you post? And I see the "nos" are leading roughly 2:1.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-01-2009, 02:50 PM
deadballera's Avatar
deadballera deadballera is offline
Todd C
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,003
Default

I also voted "NO".
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-01-2009, 03:06 PM
V117collector's Avatar
V117collector V117collector is offline
Bradley Holt
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 578
Default No!

Net54 should not have any type of seniority system that rewards members for posting. I think everyone should be viewed as an equal participant without being labeled regardless of post activity.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-01-2009, 03:16 PM
JamesGallo JamesGallo is offline
James Gallo
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Philly
Posts: 739
Default Well

The one beifit would be that if someone was a senior member and you were doing a deal with them you would have a point of reference, ie it becomes a reference.

I am not sure it is needed but that would be one benifit.

James G
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-01-2009, 03:31 PM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is offline
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,548
Default James

Good point but the post count by each members name will also aid in knowing if someone is a regular. At any rate I thought it would be fun but I guess I am in the minority....and I stayed true to my statement before and didn't, and won't, vote...
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-01-2009, 03:35 PM
slidekellyslide's Avatar
slidekellyslide slidekellyslide is offline
Dan Bretta
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 6,122
Default

Well, I voted yes and really am surprised that it's almost 2-1 in favor of no titles. Either way is fine, but lots of boards that I participate have them and it's never been a problem.
__________________
Looking for Nebraska Indians memorabilia, photos and postcards
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-01-2009, 03:59 PM
V117collector's Avatar
V117collector V117collector is offline
Bradley Holt
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 578
Default

55 members have voted now, so it shows the majority of members are lurkers and not posters. Having the “user titles system” is a poor representation to knowing whose regular or not.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-01-2009, 04:04 PM
Chris D.'s Avatar
Chris D. Chris D. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 199
Default I say no.

I think post count is irrelevant.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-01-2009, 04:09 PM
Doug's Avatar
Doug Doug is offline
Doug C.
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 900
Default

I voted no too. I don't really think the number of posts is as relevant as their content. Quality over quantity.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-01-2009, 04:19 PM
BoSox1908's Avatar
BoSox1908 BoSox1908 is offline
member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 86
Default

No vote here, I see a problem with it somewhere down the road. Would be best with none.

Ron
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-01-2009, 04:25 PM
3-2-count's Avatar
3-2-count 3-2-count is online now
T0NY @
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,866
Default

"Nah, meaningless feature".

Perfectly stated from another member.

Tony A.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-01-2009, 04:27 PM
Rob D. Rob D. is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,422
Default

If it's fun, it should not be done.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-01-2009, 04:31 PM
Koufax's Avatar
Koufax Koufax is offline
Sandy Schwartz
member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 16
Default

I think it could be fun. If it gets abused, it could always be done away with. Never know if you don't try ... only live once.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-01-2009, 04:32 PM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is offline
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,548
Default Rob D

We are 2 peas in a pod.....that's not saying much for you.....
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:23 AM.


ebay GSB