|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Jim Thorpe card on ebay
Obviously, the consensus was that this card was fake. But why? It didn't have the usual tell tale signs of a fake M101-4/5. What did I miss?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/161291332654...84.m1423.l2649 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Several of his recent positive feedback are from refunds he gave for items not passing authentication. I see where he sold a Wagner reprint for $152 too. That being said it looks like a few higher end items he sold might have been good? The coloring on the Thorpe looks off and at least one of the corners looks artificially rounded. From the scan I am not 100% on it being fake but close to it.
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
That card does not exist with that back.
__________________
If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other. - Ulysses S. Grant, military commander, 18th US President. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I don't like the artificial wear around the edges. Does a Gimbel's Thorpe even exist?
Edited to add: Todd, you beat me to it. Last edited by asoriano; 05-09-2014 at 06:27 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Evenly rounded corners but no damage to the rest of the card?
David |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I was thinking about bidding on the card, but the frame around the picture was the tipoff.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I don't know Brian, the framing is one of the few things that looks legit to me. The reprint Thorpe, at least the Fritsch version, has a much bigger gap between photo and frame, and the resulting crop leaves very little space between his right hand and the edge--about enough for 1/2 to 3/4 of one of his fingers. This fake or copy allows much more space, like the real deal.
Others have pointed out the problems with this card, which I never looked at closely because again the Thorpe cannot be found with that back. Artificial rounding--very apparent on one corner-- and a lack of edge wear are solid signs. I would also bet the card is thinner than a real m101-5 once you have it in hand. The magnified views also show it to be trimmed if not hand-cut along the right edge. Add to that the fact that seller has auctioned other bogus high-dollar m101s (Altoona Tribunes with wrong font and WaJo with wrong card #) and knows how to sell slabbed cards while leaving these raw and you have yourself most of the usual flags. My two cents.
__________________
If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other. - Ulysses S. Grant, military commander, 18th US President. Last edited by nolemmings; 05-09-2014 at 11:34 PM. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
M128 1917 National Police Gazette Thorpe...and card | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 05-07-2013 03:44 PM |
Jim thorpe strip card on ebay | WillowGrove | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 09-30-2012 06:15 PM |
Thorpe - ebay auction- authentic? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 05-16-2008 04:55 PM |
Zeenut Thorpe on ebay | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 04-21-2008 12:17 PM |
Jim Thorpe card mystery solved!!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 03-30-2006 11:57 AM |