Greatest Five Year Stretch in a Career

[Robextend]

Year W L ERA CG SHO SO

1910 25 17 1.36 38 8 313
1911 25 13 1.90 36 6 207
1912 33 12 1.39 34 7 303
1913 36 7 1.14 29 11 243
1914 28 18 1.72 33 9 225
1915 27 13 1.55 35 7 203

[packs]

Griffey was incredible from 1996 to 2000. He hit 249 home runs and drove in 685 RBIs in those 5 years. His 162 game average was 53 home runs and 146 RBIs.

Probably the greatest stretch ever for a modern hitter not cheating.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by packs

Griffey was incredible from 1996 to 2000. He hit 249 home runs and drove in 685 RBIs in those 5 years. His 162 game average was 53 home runs and 146 RBIs.

Probably the greatest stretch ever for a modern hitter not cheating.

Pujols 02-06 is right up there, with a much higher batting average. Unless of course you think he cheated.

[packs]

Albert never hit 50 or drove in 140 runs in a season. Griffey hit 50 two years in a row and drove in 140 runs THREE years in a row.

I should also mention the years Griffey didn't hit 50 in that 5 year stretch he hit 49, 48, and 40. The years he didn't drive in 140 he drove in 134 and 118.

He kills Albert. Especially when you also factor in Griffey won 4 Gold Gloves and Silver Sluggers while also winning one MVP compared to Albert's one Gold Glove, two Silver Sluggers and one MVP.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Compare the OPS. Compare the slugging percentage. Look at the batting average. I would take Albert, and I love Griffey.

[Mikehealer]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Compare the OPS. Compare the slugging percentage. Look at the batting average. I would take Albert, and I love Griffey.

You would be in good shape with either, but my goodness does defense not count at all.

[packs]

I'm taking Griffey everyday but you can't lose with either player.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Albert won a couple of gold gloves no? Granted, Griffey has the edge there. As I said, far be it from me to knock Griffey, he was the best player of the 90s, and Albert was the best player of the 00s.

[BradH]

Debates like this are one of the great things about baseball and its history. There is obviously no perfect or correct answer, but it’s fun and there are so many great choices.

Griffey is not just one of the greats of his generation, but of all-time. BUT WITH THAT SAID….I’d take Pujols in his prime (say 2002-2010) any day of the week, simply because of how he changed the way opposing managers and pitchers defended a game, always thinking about him coming up to bat again and trying to minimize the damage that he'd surely produce. I never heard that or witnessed it with Griffey.

Originally Posted by packs

Albert never hit 50 or drove in 140 runs in a season. Griffey hit 50 two years in a row and drove in 140 runs THREE years in a row.

I should also mention the years Griffey didn't hit 50 in that 5 year stretch he hit 49, 48, and 40. The years he didn't drive in 140 he drove in 134 and 118.

He kills Albert. Especially when you also factor in Griffey won 4 Gold Gloves and Silver Sluggers while also winning one MVP compared to Albert's one Gold Glove, two Silver Sluggers and one MVP.

In the five-year spans mentioned by previous posters, Pujols just happened to be playing in the same league as Barry Bonds, who was making and breaking home run history each year, and MVP voters are enthralled by homers. Pujols was also only in his second year in the league in 2002. Griffey was THE STAR of his league by 1996.

Yet, let's look at the MVP voting for those years mentioned:
Albert’s finishes in the NL MVP race those years (2002-06): 2nd, 2nd, 3rd, 1st, 2nd

Ken’s finishes in the voting for his years (1996-2000): 4th, 1st, 4th, 10th, no votes

Albert finished in the top three in MVP voting each season of his five-year span. I understand that Griffey moved to the NL in 2000, but I don't see how a player literally receives NO MVP VOTES in one year of a "great" five-year span and have that be considered one of the best ever (?). I mean, Richard Hidalgo had votes that year. Antonio Alfonseca, twelve fingers and all, even had a vote. But Griffey had none.

Griffey finished with four Silver Slugger Awards in that span and Pujols had two I believe.

Griffey was an amazing defender, but I don’t give any credence to the Gold Glove Award (those of you on the board who I’ve discussed this with in the past know my feelings that it is the most flawed and worst representation of true excellence of any award in the history of the game).

Again, no correct answers, and I can't really argue too hard against Griffey's five-year span, I'm just saying there is was more to Pujols than the power numbers and his stats are way deeper than Griffey's, in my humble opinion.

[irishdenny]

The Train was Awesome...
BiG SiX wasn't holding anything back from 1904 to 1908:

Avg wins 29.4
ERA 1.52

And HiS Next 5 years He Never went over 2.06
I wish I was around when these Guys were Mowin' them Down

[BradH]

Originally Posted by irishdenny

The Train was Awesome...
BiG SiX wasn't holding anything back from 1904 to 1908:

Avg wins 29.4
ERA 1.52

This might be the winner...Amazing numbers.

Originally Posted by irishdenny

I wish I was around when these Guys were Mowin' them Down

I will second that sentiment also - how awesome would be to go back in time and sit in the stands to watch Johnson, Mathewson, Cobb, Wagner ....

Also, I wasn't saying in my previous post that I think Pujols had the best five-year span ever, I was simply trying to say that I thought his was better than the span nominated for Griffey.

[rdixon1208]

Those are real fancy numbers, but how many Cy Young Awards did he win?

Originally Posted by Robextend

Year W L ERA CG SHO SO

1910 25 17 1.36 38 8 313
1911 25 13 1.90 36 6 207
1912 33 12 1.39 34 7 303
1913 36 7 1.14 29 11 243
1914 28 18 1.72 33 9 225
1915 27 13 1.55 35 7 203