|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
And I would have expected a 6(MK) if I sent in that 1952 card, or even a 5(MK).
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Agreed, I can't believe there is no qualifier
__________________
In progress -------------------------- 1970K NMMT 56/75 (75%) 1971T NM+ 498/752 (66%) 1954B EXMT+ 82/225 (36%) 1975T NMMT 207/660 (31%) 1968T NM 173/598 (29%) 1969T NM 127/664 (19%) 1971OPC NM 108/752 (14%) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
OK, everybody has different opinions so I'll throw mine in. In general, for vintage I prefer SGC, as I purchase a lot of 6s to 7's, and SGC cards graded at those grades consistently, in my opinion on the cards I look at, are nicer cards than similarly graded PSA versions.
Secondly, I enlarged the pic of the Alcindor, took out my ruler and checked ratio left to right and it is 70/30 with the left side of course being the '30' side. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Does the old SGC holder come into equation for anyone ? Idk maybe they were a little easier on centering back in the day.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Centering | Texas Ted | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 12-03-2015 01:52 PM |
How's the centering? | davetruth | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 06-21-2014 05:51 AM |
Centering | Touch'EmAll | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 02-26-2011 10:07 AM |
T-B or L-R Centering | mintacular | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 11-13-2010 07:18 AM |
Centering question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-04-2004 06:08 AM |