NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-08-2017, 08:28 AM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,090
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CrackaJackKid View Post
Yes and no. Not everyone lives by the philosophy of buying the card not the holder. I feel 9 times out of 10 someone is gonna pay what the market value is for the numerical grade not how the card looks. It would be different had the exact same card not been graded a 4 previously. Several hundreds of dollars difference is so called "value".
I can't agree with this more. I had a Sport Kings Bobby Jones PSA 5, that I swear to god, looked like an '8'. It had the TINIEST wrinkle....Im sure someone could have spooned it out. Did it sell as an '8'?? HELL NO....It sold as a '5', and not even VCP average...lol
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-10-2017, 12:09 PM
MW1's Avatar
MW1 MW1 is offline
Mich.ael We.ntz
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 View Post
I can't agree with this more. I had a Sport Kings Bobby Jones PSA 5, that I swear to god, looked like an '8'. It had the TINIEST wrinkle....Im sure someone could have spooned it out. Did it sell as an '8'?? HELL NO....It sold as a '5', and not even VCP average...lol
Let's see an image.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-10-2017, 02:48 PM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,090
Default

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-10-2017, 04:36 PM
MW1's Avatar
MW1 MW1 is offline
Mich.ael We.ntz
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 305
Default

Based on the centering and corner wear as well as the surface flaw/damage that runs through the "G" in "Kings," I would say the card is graded just right.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-10-2017, 05:27 PM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,090
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MW1 View Post
Based on the centering and corner wear as well as the surface flaw/damage that runs through the "G" in "Kings," I would say the card is graded just right.
LMFAO...that is bad centering to you? That is bad corner wear to you? Not hardly....what you see through the 'G' is the spider wrinkle, which I am sure has been spooned out by now.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-10-2017, 07:35 PM
HawkFan70 HawkFan70 is offline
Ch.ris_Hel.mers
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cedar Falls, IA
Posts: 181
Default

Wow - that Bobby Jones card is nice!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-10-2017, 07:37 PM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,090
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkFan70 View Post
Wow - that Bobby Jones card is nice!
I thought so too Chris....I am well versed in the Sport Kings series.....If it wasn't for that spider wrinkle, that '5' had a real god shot at a much higher grade.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-11-2017, 08:23 PM
MW1's Avatar
MW1 MW1 is offline
Mich.ael We.ntz
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 View Post
LMFAO...that is bad centering to you? That is bad corner wear to you? Not hardly....what you see through the 'G' is the spider wrinkle, which I am sure has been spooned out by now.
It looks to me like someone already tried to remove it and only ended up removing some of the red on the Sport Kings banner--and blue background underneath it--instead.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-12-2017, 08:42 AM
CrackaJackKid CrackaJackKid is offline
Rowbeartoe Toemoss
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Kansas
Posts: 469
Default It's back.

I still can't see the justification in only a 2.5 but I used it is what it is. You guys agree or disagree?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0972.jpg (77.4 KB, 355 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0973.jpg (76.9 KB, 354 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0974.jpg (69.7 KB, 356 views)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-11-2017, 12:08 PM
tiger8mush's Avatar
tiger8mush tiger8mush is offline
Rob G.
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,056
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 View Post
I had a Sport Kings Bobby Jones PSA 5, that I swear to god, looked like an '8'. ... Did it sell as an '8'?? HELL NO....It sold as a '5', and not even VCP average...lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbyw8469
Never said it was an '8', but it would not look out of place in a '7' holder.
.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-11-2017, 12:16 PM
glynparson's Avatar
glynparson glynparson is offline
Glyn Parson
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Blandon PA
Posts: 2,185
Default If we are trying to compare resunes

I've had well over 20000 vintage cards graded. As I stated earlier eye appeal is excellent on the card that is not the same as technical grade I agree that it looks like a 7 from 1992-2000 but both psa and sgc have tightens their standards since then looks properly graded.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-11-2017, 12:25 PM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,090
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tiger8mush View Post
.
Touche......Random person 2, Bobby 0.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PSA Review cardsnstuff Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 8 09-24-2016 07:39 AM
Any luck with a PSA 'Review'? Kzoo Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 21 07-24-2015 10:18 PM
2014 In Review Joe_G. Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 8 12-28-2014 07:32 AM
55,56 topps raw review FS zachclose21 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 4 06-05-2013 07:44 PM
PSA review question Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 14 06-01-2007 11:28 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:46 PM.


ebay GSB