|
#51
|
||||
|
||||
Just wanted to add to the OP that there is a card show in Redford Michigan this Sunday from 9am to 2pm. https://www.facebook.com/RedfordCardShow/
I'm sure you could get an opinion there or at least actually see and feel an ungraded '52 common to compare with yours. Lots of older gentlemen selling 50's Topps cards set up shop at the show....like every other card show in America. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
So like other Mantles on net54....we never get to see the results of a PSA submission... gone with the wind
|
#53
|
||||
|
||||
I highly doubt there was ever a PSA submission.
|
#54
|
||||
|
||||
When someone comes on the board with less than 20 posts and asks about a 52 Mantle, why do I always wonder if it's someone asking "how good does this fake look?" And then we tell them how to make the fake better. Just me being cynical I guess
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
cynicism-free zone
Those have been my suspicions, as well.
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
What a cynical group
|
#57
|
||||
|
||||
I always figure they are just looking for a sucker to buy their fake Mantle they bought off Etsy.
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
My thoughts as well.
__________________
Mantle Master Set - as complete as it is going to get Yankees Game Used Hat Style Run (1923-2017): 57/60 (missing 2008/9 holiday hats & 2017 Players Weekend) |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
You guys are probably right and if so think how maddening it must be for a guy to get all this advice about his card and what he should do with it when all he wants is an offer
|
#60
|
||||
|
||||
100% Fake
Just peeked at the photos and no way is this card real. The scanner did a good job to capture the pattern of ink rosettes used in 4C printing. Among thest I;ve ever seen.
But, the corners are obviously hand-scraped on sandpaper or a file to round them. You can tell because the paper is curling on the rounded corners. Sure sign it's artificial wear created very quickly. Real wear would result in those paper fibers slowly wearing away leaving a diminished thickness of the stock on the worn corners. Luckily there is no counterfeit substitute for card wear that occurs over time. Total 100% fake. |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
I didn't disappear guys.....i should be hearing back from PSA any day now...It's supposed to take 7 days after they receive it and I'm on day 10.....growing impatient.....i'm really hoping that the extra time may be because it's legit.
|
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
well if the card ends up being 'psa legit' then all of the people posting that its 100% fake etc will be looking pretty bad..
|
#65
|
||||
|
||||
Good luck techkiller. I think PSA is swamped right now. I have sent some cards valued <$500 to them. They received on 11/24, entered in their system on 12/5!!!! and still "in process".
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
I called PSA and although they have not completed my submission yet (UGH!!!! Day 14 of estimated 7day) I was told the Mantle was found to be a counterfeit....even though it has the honeycomb printing....disappointing for sure but it was a $25 lottery ticket so i'm not that upset.
|
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Actually the grades just posted on their site.....The 52 Mantle was graded "N4 Questionable Authenticity".....my question to all of you....what does that even mean?
|
#68
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
It could be a very good fake or a very poor genuine. Glad to read it was only $25 bucks for you.
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#69
|
||||
|
||||
It means fake, but it also means their lawyers won't let them call it "FAKE" for the 0.001% chance that the card is real.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Mickey-Mant...cAAOSwHNxaQd6S |
#71
|
||||
|
||||
Not surprised at all for the identifying reason I noted in my post
|
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#73
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks for coming back to fill us in with the results, tech.
|
#74
|
|||
|
|||
At least you will save a lot in grading fees versus if the mantle turned out to be real. You saved a lot there at least.
Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 12-27-2017 at 06:38 PM. |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Would have been a nice story if it was real, but 1) '52 Mantle's have been reprinted/faked for 40 years and 2) I'm always suspicious when the ONE card someone "finds in their attic" is a high dollar card. Where are the other '52's in the stash? No wrappers? No other years? Seems ridiculous to me.
|
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
A friend of mine asked if I could check out his collection before he gave it to a family member. Just a quick "oh yeah, can you check out my collection" just before we headed out drinking. That was a surprise, since I didn't think he even had a collection at all. I was nearly right - 4 cards, between 71 and 73 including a Schmidt rookie. I've also come across antique dealers with one card of a star from the 50's. It's less common, but for a while some dealers would buy only a card or two from a collection, or just a single from a random seller. I got my Baker silk at a coin show that way, it was the only baseball card the dealer had. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
legit 51 mantle? | onlythefinest2327 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 28 | 08-12-2017 12:55 PM |
does this mantle look legit? | ullmandds | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 12-07-2015 05:43 PM |
Mickey Mantle signature. Is it legit? | KNH | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 9 | 04-26-2010 03:02 PM |
is this legit? (Mantle cards) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 10-04-2004 08:03 PM |
Bowman Mantle Rookie -Legit ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-07-2003 08:07 PM |