![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With the Schofield over the Red Sox rookies, we now have 6 of 7 in another column - Schofield, Red Sox Rookies, Gibbon, Braves Rookies, Coleman, Hannan.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I keep forgetting there are only seven cards in each column, in my mind I keep thinking there are twelve. If we can figure out the seven cards in most of the eleven columns this Series might be doable after all.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Enough over/unders will let us ID the columns - it's the rows that seems like it will be tough - estimates will be possible based upon pop counts, but...
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Vic Roznovsky is under Steve Barber, it's an Astro/Oriole under Barber with a flaw near the right edge of the top border line that matches every Roznovsky card.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 03-18-2024 at 10:32 PM. Reason: better scan |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't think anyone has called this one yet, it is a Dodger/Yankee under Wynn and the only cards as of now it can be are Ferrara and Friend, I am very confident it is Ferrara because it looks like real sky unlike the Friend with the fake blue background and there is a miscut Friend with a Cub/White Sox above him. The only possibility of it being Friend is he has two different rows above him which I very highly doubt so I am going to call it Ferrara.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Hannan Schofield Red Sox Rookie Stars and Gibbon Braves Rookie Stars Coleman
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I believe these are the current vertical combos we have in the interior not including the LE and the RE cards:
Phillie-Indian Barber Roznovsky Kline F Howard Oliva Simmons Ellsworth Hannan Schofield Red Sox Rookie Stars Dodger/Yankee Richardson B Rodgers Cannizzaro Belinsky Wyatt Gibbon Braves Rookie Stars Coleman Bunker Bob Lee Buford Latman Red/Twin Yankees Rookie Stars Bressoud Blefary Klippstein Brave/Angel Jimenez O'Donoghue Wynn Ferrara Hatton Athletics Team
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1. Wasn't there that strange miscut of Howard, with yellow above, i.e., Card/Tiger but the coloring went close to the edge?
2. isn't there a Brave/Angel or perhaps an Indian/Phil under Coleman? 3. There is a MC of Azcue, which had been tentaively, but not conclusively, identifed as Buford. 4. A card or Tiger is below Klippstein. 5. Indian/Phil may be above Wynn. 6. Radatz appears to be above Rollins 7. A top Mc of Covington appears to have a Phil/Indian. A bottom Mc of Covington might have a Cub/WS below him 8. McAuliffe appears to have a Twin/Red below him 9. A pirate or Red Sox is above Bailey 10. A pirate/Red Sox is above Ken Johnson 11. A WS or Cub is above Hargan (508) 12. I can't definitely say, but there might be Indian/Phil above Lenny Green (502) 14. A Senator or Giant is above Linz (522) 15 A twin/Red is also above O'donoghue 16. Phillies team has Indian-Phil above it 17. Pirate or Red Sox above McDaniel 18. There is a card below George Banks that hasn't been positively identified but may be Indian/Phil 19. A Twin/Red is above Tommy John 20. There is a coloring band I can't identify above Bob Rodgers |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
5. Haven't seen that one. 6. You're right, I missed that one. 12. Definitely a Phillie/Indian. 18. Haven't seen that one. 20. I think it's safe to say that Yankee/Dodger is Richardson.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think you're wrong about being wrong - check out post 29 in this thread - there's an image of Schofield over the Braves Rookie stars, no? I don't think it can be another team. So in one instance he's over the Bosox and in another the Braves - this means the column of 6 is still alive.
Last edited by deweyinthehall; 03-19-2024 at 06:40 AM. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you blow that Schofield MC up, it looks more like the violet of the Red Sox than the lavender of the Braves, IMO
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes, that is correct, it is the Red Sox Rookie Stars and I was wrong when I originally said it was Braves Rookie Stars in post #29. It's the same scan I just flipped it on its side later on.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm pretty sure that is Stigman above Bailey because that color band has irregularities that seem to match Stigman but I don't know if I can call it.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That Stigman card has a lot going on. Looks like a Red Sox or Pirate is to his right.
Here are Wynn and Banks miscuts. 1966_banks.jpg 1966_520_TC.jpg |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps Semi Hi Lot of 36 EX or Better $100.00 Shipped | Lee_Detroit | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 01-28-2019 04:25 PM |
FS: 1966 Topps hi# and semi-hi# lots | jimmysuitcase | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 5 | 10-31-2018 09:55 PM |
FS 7 Different 1966 Topps Semi-high Numbers | Northviewcats | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 6 | 12-18-2017 08:13 PM |
1966 Topps Semi-Highs For Sale - EX/MT | Eggoman | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 02-14-2017 07:42 AM |
1966 Topps semi high 6th series | hangman62 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-21-2014 01:09 PM |