|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
1957 Topps - What would be considered a "low pop?"
Posted By: jackgoodman
So, as an example, I've looked at the 1957 Topps Baseball set on the PSA Pop Report. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
1957 Topps - What would be considered a "low pop?"
Posted By: JimCrandell
I would say for 1957 Topps pop 50 or less. Probably means ex checklists and contest cards, 25 cards or so could be classified as this--most of which come from the series(3rd) that goes from roughly 260-340. Last time I checked I think Garcia and Kellner are lowest pops in set--both around 30. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
1957 Topps - What would be considered a "low pop?"
Posted By: Bob
I think using the average population gives way too many low pops. Using 58% of the average pop in 1957 gives the following list. Since Don Bessent was expensive for me, I couldn't see leaving him out. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
1957 Topps - What would be considered a "low pop?"
Posted By: Bob
Jim beat me to it. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
1957 Topps - What would be considered a "low pop?"
Posted By: jackgoodman
Thanks Jim and Bob. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
1957 Topps - What would be considered a "low pop?"
Posted By: Bob
58% was reached by working backwards. Nothing at all magical about it. Somewhere around 50 or so would be considered low pop for 57 PSA 8s. I'm sure it varies tremendously from year to year or grade to grade. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
1957 Topps - What would be considered a "low pop?"
Posted By: Bob
I wouldn't get too attached to trying to come up with a rule of thumb for low pops. Some cards are legitimately hard to find in a certain grade based on centering issues, registration, print dots, etc. Others are hard to find because demand exceeds supply (i.e., a large enough number haven't been submitted yet). Learning to differentiate between the two categories is crucial if you're going to compete for lower population cards. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
1957 Topps - What would be considered a "low pop?"
Posted By: Frank Evanov
In terms of acquiring cards Jack, the 1957 set is screwy. You can't always go by the pops. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
1957 Topps - What would be considered a "low pop?"
Posted By: JimCrandell
Jack, |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
1957 Topps - What would be considered a "low pop?"
Posted By: Al
Bob---did you know that 67 % of all statistics are made up on the spot |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
1957 Topps - What would be considered a "low pop?"
Posted By: Paul S
Al -- You got the numbers to back that up? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Topps 1957 Mantle "Six" card panel... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 07-11-2008 12:58 PM |
What is considered to be "Lefty" Groves rookie card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 09-20-2007 05:19 AM |
What is considered "high grade"? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-11-2007 11:44 AM |
1935 Wheaties Fancy Frames Glenn "Pop" Warner | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 03-20-2007 02:07 PM |
PSA POP Report for E107 "Chief" Bender | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 12-13-2006 12:17 PM |